"Quit" might be the most forbidden word in sports. Journalist Lindsay Crouse says that's exactly the problem.
Lindsay spent 15 years at The New York Times covering the extremes of human performance before turning the question on herself: what if the constant pushing through wasn't actually working? Her new book, The Case for Quitting, argues that stepping back is often the smarter, braver choice, not the weaker one. Lindsay and JP unpack why our brains default to staying on a path long after it stops serving us, and how Roger Bannister broke the four minute mile only after he stopped training entirely for three days.
This one is for any coach who has ever told an athlete to push through pain that wasn't actually productive, and for any coach who has done the same thing to themselves.
3 Quotes | 2 Questions | 1 Resource
Your fast-track to the episode's most actionable ideas.
"Quitting is not simply a failure of resolve or an easy way out. Often it's a courageous first step to something better."
Lindsay Crouse
"Our brains prefer not to decide. They prefer to slide, to continue down the path we're already on."
Lindsay Crouse
"My identity wasn't even just a basketball player. My identity was the guy who had this dream."
JP Nerbun
Q1: Where in your season are you "sliding" instead of deciding, just because it's the path you already know?
Q2: If you set a deadline to reassess one commitment on your team right now, what would that deadline be, and what would make you actually keep it?
The Case for Quitting by Lindsay Crouse
A 15 year New York Times veteran makes the research-backed case that stepping back is often the braver, smarter choice than pushing through.
Find the book here
Get the notes and tools:
tocculture.com
Join TOC Coach, community, courses, and live coaching:
tocculture.com
Better Coaches. Better Leaders. Better Culture.