There’s a particular kind of vertigo that comes from watching a podcast you started get better without you. I launched the Ecommerce Braintrust podcast back in 2017, and while I’m no longer running it, I still listen because the team at Acadia is in the trenches every day doing the work.
A recent conversation between my old Acadia colleagues on measurement really got me thinking about a question I hear from brands all the time: if every advertising platform says it’s winning, why don’t the business results reflect that? When Meta, Google, Amazon and retail media networks all claim credit for conversions, the numbers can quickly become impossible to reconcile. In this episode, I share snippets from a recent Ecommerce Braintrust episode that dig into the idea of “engine inflation,” why multi-touch attribution is struggling in 2026, and what brands should be using instead to understand what is actually driving incremental growth.
This episode is sponsored by GrowthLoop
Timeline
[00:00] - The measurement problem every advertiser is wrestling with: when every platform claims to be winning, why don't the business results add up?
[01:45] - Introducing “engine inflation” and why platform-reported revenue can exceed actual business revenue.
[03:56] - Why multi-touch attribution isn't coming to save us and why Acadia has moved away from MTA.
[04:52] - The three-pillar measurement framework: media mix modeling, incrementality testing, and platform optimization.
[06:15] - Why the growth of retail media networks makes a holistic view of total media spend increasingly important.
[08:34] - Why measuring Amazon and Walmart simply by retail media network and ad type can produce the wrong conclusions.
[09:46] - How defensive branded search can look incredibly efficient while doing very little to drive incremental growth.
Links & Resources