Good decision making in law is not always about thinking harder. For junior lawyers, knowing when to keep researching, when to trust their judgement and when to make the call is a critical skill that takes time and experience to develop. Here, we explore the difference between quick, pressure and big decisions, and how lawyers can learn to make better judgement calls.
In this episode of The Lawyers Weekly Show, host Jerome Doraisamy speaks with Elit Lawyers by McGirr & Snell managing partner Danielle Snell about why decision making is a skill that is not always taught in law school, how junior lawyers can recognise when they have enough information to act, and why experienced practitioners can often reach conclusions far more quickly. They discuss navigating pressure and artificial urgency, knowing when further research adds value and when it simply delays an inevitable decision, the role of supervision in developing professional judgement, and how AI can be used to test and challenge legal thinking without replacing the critical reasoning skills lawyers need to build.
If you like this episode, show your support by rating us or leaving a review on Apple Podcasts (The Lawyers Weekly Show) and by following Lawyers Weekly on social media: Facebook, X and LinkedIn.
If you have any questions about what you heard today, any topics of interest you have in mind, or if you'd like to lend your voice to the show, email editor@lawyersweekly.com.au