CardioNerds (Dr. Hamza Patel, Dr. Jenna Skowronski, and Dr. Apoorva Gangavelli) discuss advanced heart failure and LVAD management with Dr. Mark Belkin, Advanced Heart Failure & Transplant Cardiologist, and Dr. Chris Salerno, Cardiothoracic Surgeon. They explore the nuances of right ventricular (RV) physiology, perioperative hemodynamic optimization, long-term complications, sensitization and transplant considerations, and the evolving role of GDMT in LVAD patients. This episode highlights the delicate interplay between surgical and medical management in achieving optimal outcomes for patients living with durable mechanical circulatory support.Audio editing by CardioNerds Academy intern, student doctor, Pace Wetstein.
“The right ventricle sets the stage.” — LVAD success hinges on RV performance; a struggling RV can turn a perfect LVAD surgery into a perfect storm.
“Watch the ratios.” — A PAPi < 2 and RA:PCWP >0.6 signal high risk for RV failure post-implant; trends and response to optimization matter more than static numbers.
“From hemocompatibility to hemodynamics.” — The LVAD field has moved from fighting pump thrombosis to mastering long-term RV failure and aortic insufficiency.
“Not all antibodies are created equal.” — LVAD-related sensitization often resolves post-transplant, reminding clinicians to interpret PRA trends in context.
“Recovery is possible.” — The RESTAGE-HF trial and emerging SGLT2 data hint at a new era: not just sustaining life with LVADs but restoring native heart function.
Notes
Notes drafted by Dr. Hamza Patel.
1. Hemodynamic & Vasoactive Management of the RV
Use norepinephrine and vasopressin for pressor support; consider dobutamine as inotrope of choice.
Consider avoiding early milrinone due to hypotension and reduced coronary perfusion.
Use inhaled NO or epoprostenol selectively; institutional variation depends on cost and supply.
Key hemodynamic markers:
PAPi = (PA systolic – PA diastolic) / RA pressure.
PAPi < 2 → increased RV failure risk.
RA:PCWP ratio ≈ 0.6 normal; ≈ 1 → severe RV dysfunction.
RV reserve—the ability to improve these indices with optimization—is a stronger predictor of outcomes than baseline numbers alone.
NOTE: there is no robust data to guide vasoactive medical decision-making and there is substantial institutional variability in practive.