In this episode of the Movement Logic Podcast, Laurel explores how we’ve come to assign moral value to certain movement concepts—like compression, flexion, anterior tilt, and instability—and why that language does more harm than good. She unpacks how terms that are neutral by definition often get rebranded as “bad,” “dangerous,” or “dysfunctional” in movement and rehab spaces.

Rather than offering a list of “better” movement cues, Laurel invites listeners to step outside of binary thinking. This episode explores how our wiring, combined with marketing and group identity, fuels a polarizing narrative—a red-X/green-checkmark mentality that pits “functional” against “dysfunctional.”

Whether you’re a teacher, coach, or curious mover, this episode offers a reminder: biomechanical concepts are just descriptions of what’s happening—not value-laden truths. And when we let go of moralizing movement, we open the door to more creativity, exploration, and individualized problem-solving.

Resources:

The Truth About Good vs Bad Muscles - Results Not Typical Podcast

98: Capacities for Longevity Part 3 - Cardio

94: Capacities for Longevity Part 2 - Power

90: Capacities for Longevity Part 1 - Strength

89: Is Dead Butt Syndrome Real?

80: Posture Panic Pt. 3 with Author Dr. Beth Linker, PhD

79: Make Yoga U Make Sense

78: Behemoth Knee Myths

76: Posture Panic Part 2

74: McGill We Go Again

73: Posture Panic Pt. 1

67: Popular Explanations for SI Joint Pain are Wrong, Says Science

66: Dismantling Long and Lean Pt. 3

63: Dismantling Long and Lean Part 2

62: Make McGill Make Sense

58: Alignment Dogma - Shoulders

54: Alignment Dogma - Spine

48: Alignment Dogma - Pelvis

19: Oh, NO! Nose Breathing and Nitric Oxide

Review: Effect of training and lifting equipment for preventing back pain in lifting and handling: systematic review

Review: Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique

102: The Problem with Moralizing Movemen...