logo
episode-header-image
Sep 2023
14m 37s

Bob Motta On New Bombshells in Alex Murd...

True Crime Today
About this episode
In a riveting discussion on the podcast "Hidden Killers," Tony Brueski and Defense Attorney Bob Motta delve deep into the latest twists and turns of the Alec Murdoch case, raising concerns about the very integrity of the jury deliberation process. Motta, a seasoned lawyer, expresses his shock at the recent allegations, suggesting that if they are true, the repercussions could be monumental for the justice system as a whole. The revelations point to the possibility of undue influence within the jury room, throwing the verdict's validity into serious doubt.
 
 The focal point of the conversation is the recent motion filed by Alex Murdaugh's attorneys to dismiss the case based on "after discovered evidence." Motta explains, "I've been practicing a long time. We have had issues with jurors before, but nothing that rose to the level of what this potentially could be." If these claims are true, they are not only shocking but also deeply troubling for the entire justice system.
 
 The specific point of contention lies in South Carolina's rules that allow for the introduction of new evidence as long as it's been discovered with due diligence, within a time frame of up to a year. This rule, labeled as "29 B," was unknown to many outside the state, and its recent invocation has caught many by surprise, including Motta. The allegations claim undue influence over the jury by a county clerk, a significant breach if proven.
 
 Motta details the typical jury process, highlighting how in Illinois, where he practices, a bailiff, rather than a clerk, usually guides the jurors. He says, "Who are those guys or gals that have on the... jackets that walk around that are basically there to protect the judge and they do the judge's bidding... those are typically the people that are dealing with the jury." This divergence from the norm raises even more questions about the Murdoch case.
 
 At the heart of this issue are the affidavits by jurors, in which they claim to have been influenced during the trial. Brueski points out, "We're talking about the testimony, the sworn affidavits from jurors. We have at least two of them... this is what happened." The testimonies provide a clear account, making the revelations hard to dismiss as mere hearsay or misunderstandings.
 
 Motta also touches on the divide amongst observers of the case, saying, "There's the camp that... believes it's low country. You don't know how low country works. It's as corrupt as can be... And then there's the camp where... if his sixth amendment right were violated... he deserves a new trial." This divide reflects the broader conversation on whether constitutional rights are paramount, regardless of one's opinion about the defendant's character.
 
 Furthermore, questions arise regarding Judge Newman's capacity to remain impartial if there is a new trial. Motta contends, "I think that when he put that out there for public consumption, it showed that he's moved out of the role of unbiased... He now has openly stated his opinion on the record."
 
 Amidst the back-and-forth on the legal implications, a broader narrative emerges about the allure of fame and the impact of high-profile cases on individuals within the system. The county clerk, alleged to be writing a book about the case, might have overstepped her bounds due to the seductive pull of the national spotlight.
 
 With these revelations, the Alec Murdoch case takes on an even more complex hue, as the very foundations of the trial are now under scrutiny. The conversation between Brueski and Motta not only sheds light on these new developments but also underscores the essential question: Can justice truly be served if the process itself is compromised?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com

Up next
Jun 26
Big Breakdown: The Fallout From The Crimes of Alex Murdaugh
Big Breakdown: The Fallout From The Crimes of Alex Murdaugh This comprehensive episode retraces the dramatic unraveling of the once-powerful Murdaugh dynasty of South Carolina. We begin the timeline in February 2019, when Alex’s son Paul and friend Mallory Beach went missing afte ... Show More
57m 3s
Jun 15
Alex Murdaughs Last Hope - Why Court Clerks Arrest Could Mean Retrial-WEEK IN REVIEW
Welcome to the "Week in Review," where we delve into the true stories behind this week's headlines. Your host, Tony Brueski, joins hands with a rotating roster of guests, sharing their insights and analysis on a collection of intriguing, perplexing, and often chilling stories tha ... Show More
17m 13s
Jun 9
Alex Murdaugh's Last Hope: Why Court Clerk's Arrest Could Mean Retrial
Alex Murdaugh's Last Hope: Why Court Clerk's Arrest Could Mean Retrial The Alex Murdaugh murder trial took a stunning turn when court clerk Becky Hill was arrested on four felony charges in May 2025, potentially opening the door for one of the most controversial retrials in Ameri ... Show More
17m 8s
Recommended Episodes
Aug 2023
Bob Motta On Consequences Of Rushing Kohberger Trial
In a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, a spotlight was shone on the intricate details surrounding the Bryan Kohberger case. Bob Motta, a seasoned defense attorney and host of the podcast "Defense Diaries," joined Brueski to discuss the evolvi ... Show More
11m 9s
Sep 2023
S2E40: Jury Tampering? Retrial? Bombshell new allegations in Murdaugh murder case
Alex Murdaugh's lawyers are demanding a retrial after several jurors who convicted their client of murdering his wife and son have suddenly come forward to accuse Colleton County Clerk of Court Rebecca ("Becky") Hill of impropriety. Attorneys Jim Griffin and Dick Harpootlian say ... Show More
53m 57s
Nov 2023
Bryan Kohberger's Courtroom Optics Look Worse and Worse
Can a crime scene visit sway the jury's verdict? This crucial question has emerged in the latest discussions around the Bryan Kohberger case on the podcast "Hidden Killers," featuring psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott. With the FBI recently unboarding the house on King Roa ... Show More
8m 14s
Nov 2023
How Important Is It for Kohberger Jury to Visit the Actual Crime Scene?
Could revisiting a crime scene years later alter the course of a high-profile murder trial? This is the crux of a recent debate stirred by the decision to potentially dismantle a crucial piece of evidence: the home on King Road, Moscow, Idaho, where four university students were ... Show More
5m 47s
Oct 2023
Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Charges in Bryan Kohberger Murder Case, Allows Cameras in Courtroom
In a significant legal development, Judge John Judge has denied the motion to dismiss murder charges against Bryan Kohberger, a 28-year-old criminology PhD student accused of murdering four University of Idaho students. The defense had argued for dismissal, citing grand jury bias ... Show More
11m 16s
Aug 2023
Kohberger's Alibi That Didn't Surface
On a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a popular podcast exploring intricate legal and criminal issues, Deborah Aherns, a former public defender and professor of law at Seattle U School of Law, discussed the controversial trial of Bryan Kohberger. Kohberger's case has gripped p ... Show More
5m 37s
Aug 2023
Bryan Kohberger Trial: What's Next?
The case against Brian Kohberger is steadily becoming more complicated with each passing day as it becomes evident that a speedy trial is no longer a possibility. Neama Rahmani, an attorney and former federal prosecutor, joined Tony Brueski on the "Hidden Killers" podcast to disc ... Show More
5m 57s