Evaluating Arguments Part One

Part six of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this final lecture we will look at fallacies. These are bad arguments that can easily be mistaken for good arguments. 

Part four of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this lecture we will learn how to evaluate arguments and how to tell whether an argument is good or bad, focusing specifically on inductive arguments. 

Part three of a six-part series on critical reasoning. In this lecture we will focus on how to identify and analyse arguments, and how to set arguments out logic book-style to make them easier to evaluate. 

Lecture 6 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners. 

Lecture 1 of 6 in Marianne Talbot's series on critical reasoning for beginners. 

In this first lecture, using Descartes famous argument for the claim “I think therefore I am’, we examine how to identify and evaluate arguments. 

Fifth lecture in the Philosophy of Religion lecture series. 

من حلقة الحُجّة الوجودية EP40: The Ontological Argument Continue reading → 

Course Listening for Lesson 6 - "How Do You Read an Article of the Summa?" 

من حلقة الحُجّة الوجودية EP40: The Ontological Argument Continue reading → 

This is the fifth lecture in the 2008 John Locke Lecture series entitled 'Logic, Normativity, and Rational Revisability'. 

James Grant, lecturer in philosophy, University of Oxford gives his sixth lecture in the Aesthetics series on the interpretation of literature.