What does research actually do for a medical student, and who is it really for? The Short Coats--M2s Jonah Albrecht and Regan DeMaris, and M4 Radha Vellamuri--sit down with Donna Santillan, PhD and Mark Santillan, MD PhD to talk about the value of research in medical school (think quality, not quantity, heavily weighted toward quality). The Santillans (married, if it wasn't clear) have mentored many aspiring researchers in their careers; Radha even took a class they taught when she was an undergrad.
We discuss the common perception that there is a research arms race when it comes to medical students trying to match into their specialties, a 13-fold increase in med student publications from 2014-2022. Some even want to ban medical student research, although it's perhaps not surprising the Santillans don't agree: from their perspective as scientists in obstetrics, you can't fully understand what is good research and what isn't unless you participate. The factors they blame: schools moving toward pass/fail grading and virtual residency interviews. The former makes it harder for students to distinguish themselves with grades, and the latter means more students applying to programs they don't really care about. Both end up putting more pressure on students to increase the number of publications to stand out in the most competitive specialties.
Also discussed: shallow research contaminating AI training data, ERAS changes Radha's had to navigate, and how students can sidestep the arms race. Also, we learn that Radha can beatbox, something she refuses to demonstrate unless Dave is interviewing her for a residency position. Huh.