Paul's anguish over Israel's unbelief despite their covenant privileges introduces the complex question of how God's promises can be trusted if His chosen people reject their Messiah. His argument about divine sovereignty in election uses examples from Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Esau, to demonstrate that God's choice has never been based on human works or decisions. The potter and clay metaphor illustrates divine prerogative in mercy and judgment while maintaining human responsibility, though the mystery of how these truths relate remains beyond full comprehension.