The podcast "Hidden Killers," hosted by Tony Brueski, recently delved into a convoluted alibi that has astounded many listeners. In the episode, Brueski discussed the puzzling defense of an individual who claimed to be out for a nighttime drive when a crime occurred. Shavaun Scott, a psychotherapist and author, provided insight into the psychological aspects of this alibi.
Brueski reacted to the revelation of the alibi with astonishment, saying, "I was driving and I almost did a spit take of my Slurpee." The alibi, according to him, seems like a weak proposition, "It almost sounds like an admission of guilt." He emphasized the oddity of the alibi, noting that not being able to pin down a specific location such as a Taco Bell 50 miles away only makes the alibi sound more dubious.
But it's not just the absence of a solid alibi that caught Brueski's attention. He questioned the defense attorney, Anne Taylor's strategy, pointing out that, "A lot of people were giving her credit early on, and I was too of, oh, she really seems to be playing this well. This doesn't seem like a good move."
Shavaun Scott's perspective as a psychotherapist provided listeners with a deeper understanding of the situation. Responding to the alibi's implications, she remarked, "It makes me think of someone who's really creepy out looking for opportunities to kill people at night."
Scott further elaborated on the psychological significance of someone frequently taking nighttime drives. She drew a distinction between teenagers, who might drive at night for the sheer novelty of it, and adults whose nocturnal drives could suggest they're "looking for opportunities for something that is not good."
Scott also provided insight into the mindset of individuals who commit sex crimes. "People who commit sex crimes often have an addictive quality," she explained. "They spend a lot of time looking and planning and thinking about, and then it turns into stalking and picking specific areas or specific victims."
Intriguingly, Scott also touched on the broader category of sexual domination killers. "It's the violence and the murder and the mutilating the victims that's the sexual part for them," she remarked, emphasizing that such individuals derive intense arousal from these violent acts.
The discussion shifted to whether the act of stalking and following victims, even in the absence of a direct sexual assault at the crime scene, could still be categorized as a sex crime. Scott affirmed, clarifying that for sadistic killers, the act of violence itself serves as a source of sexual pleasure. She said, "They find an intense sexual arousal and this then becomes the fuel for masturbation for them."
Shedding light on the warped mindset of these individuals, Scott added, "They get this sense of euphoria, this sense of God-like power, and that's the part that they really become addicted to."
The episode illuminated the profound challenges legal professionals face when dissecting alibis and defense narratives and the crucial role that understanding human psychology plays in the process. As the case unravels, one thing is clear: the lines between normal behavior and potential predatory intent can be terrifyingly thin.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at
https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
